Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • All Topics
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Caint logo. It's just text.
  1. Home
  2. 196
  3. Charule Kirk
Welcome to Caint!

Issues? Post in Comments & Feedback
You can now view, reply, and favourite posts from the Fediverse. You can click here or click on the on the navigation bar on the left.

Charule Kirk

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 196
onehundredninetysix
28 Posts 24 Posters 1 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org

    That’s what always got me. He was so young when he gained traction. 31 is still pretty young, that fucker was 10 years younger than me. And these cockroaches were like: listen to this 20 something guy, he has it figured out.
    I’m not saying that age equals intellect or anything, but i imagine the dumb shit i thought about when i was in my 20es and i’m just glad no one gave me a microphone and a platform.

    But at least i was never a fascist piece of shit.

    A This user is from outside of this forum
    A This user is from outside of this forum
    alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
    wrote last edited by
    #11

    Ben Shapiro simultaneously looking 14 and 45

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
    • E endlessapollo@lemmy.world
      This post did not contain any content.
      C This user is from outside of this forum
      C This user is from outside of this forum
      collapse_already@lemmy.ml
      wrote last edited by
      #12

      We’ll never know if he considered himself an acceptable loss for the freedom to own guns. It is definitely nice to see karma bite someone like him in the ass.

      flying_sheep@lemmy.mlF C 2 Replies Last reply
      15
      • riwoR riwo

        did charlie kirk get shot?

        edit: wikipedia confirms
        1000040707

        B This user is from outside of this forum
        B This user is from outside of this forum
        birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        wrote last edited by
        #13

        “Right wing” isn’t true, he’s far-right. And not a political activist, but a terrorist.

        K Resol van LemmyR 2 Replies Last reply
        4
        • C collapse_already@lemmy.ml

          We’ll never know if he considered himself an acceptable loss for the freedom to own guns. It is definitely nice to see karma bite someone like him in the ass.

          flying_sheep@lemmy.mlF This user is from outside of this forum
          flying_sheep@lemmy.mlF This user is from outside of this forum
          flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
          wrote last edited by
          #14

          They never do. The USA’s current Bonespurs-in-Chief is a good example.

          J 1 Reply Last reply
          3
          • B birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone

            “Right wing” isn’t true, he’s far-right. And not a political activist, but a terrorist.

            K This user is from outside of this forum
            K This user is from outside of this forum
            kameecoding@lemmy.world
            wrote last edited by
            #15

            Eh, terrorist is a bit of a stretch, that word has a certain definition, definitely a fucking fascist though.

            B 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone

              “Right wing” isn’t true, he’s far-right. And not a political activist, but a terrorist.

              Resol van LemmyR This user is from outside of this forum
              Resol van LemmyR This user is from outside of this forum
              Resol van Lemmy
              wrote last edited by
              #16

              Isn’t “far-right” part of the right wing?

              B 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C collapse_already@lemmy.ml

                We’ll never know if he considered himself an acceptable loss for the freedom to own guns. It is definitely nice to see karma bite someone like him in the ass.

                C This user is from outside of this forum
                C This user is from outside of this forum
                callouscomic@lemmy.zip
                wrote last edited by
                #17

                Karma isn’t a thing.

                pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zoneP 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • Resol van LemmyR Resol van Lemmy

                  Isn’t “far-right” part of the right wing?

                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                  birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  wrote last edited by
                  #18

                  There’s far-left, left, centre-left, centre, centre-right, right, and far-right.

                  Far- is that which employs violence and suppresses all other opinions given the chance.

                  Centre is that which is always open for compromise.

                  The others are not always open for compromise, but discuss with each other in polite atmosphere.

                  By definition, the far-right necessitates excluding anything less insane than itself.

                  That said though, in my view the real spectrum is whether someone supports the workers. Be they American, Russian, Chinese, Vietnamese, Senegalese, Swiss, or whatever else.

                  riwoR 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • E endlessapollo@lemmy.world
                    This post did not contain any content.
                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    adolfschmitler@lemmy.world
                    wrote last edited by
                    #19

                    “Looks like he took a left-leaning stance in the end after all”

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    10
                    • C callouscomic@lemmy.zip

                      Karma isn’t a thing.

                      pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zoneP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zoneP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                      wrote last edited by
                      #20

                      Ever heard of a figure of speech

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      8
                      • E endlessapollo@lemmy.world
                        This post did not contain any content.
                        P This user is from outside of this forum
                        P This user is from outside of this forum
                        plyth@feddit.org
                        wrote last edited by
                        #21

                        “Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary,”

                        Marx said in his “Address of the Central Committee to the Communist League.”

                        It can’t be all of the left making those jokes.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        10
                        • K kameecoding@lemmy.world

                          Eh, terrorist is a bit of a stretch, that word has a certain definition, definitely a fucking fascist though.

                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                          blametheantifa@lemmy.world
                          wrote last edited by
                          #22

                          He was a terrorist by definition.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          3
                          • P peoplebeproblems@midwest.social

                            Woah jeez

                            Yeah there was no way he was surviving that with how quickly he lost that blood.

                            I’m glad an audience of his supporters get to experience what so many other Americans have gotten to experience.

                            G This user is from outside of this forum
                            G This user is from outside of this forum
                            greyeyedghost@lemmy.ca
                            wrote last edited by
                            #23

                            I’m sure those were paid actors in this false flag operation.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • flying_sheep@lemmy.mlF flying_sheep@lemmy.ml

                              They never do. The USA’s current Bonespurs-in-Chief is a good example.

                              J This user is from outside of this forum
                              J This user is from outside of this forum
                              jcbazpx@lemmy.world
                              wrote last edited by
                              #24

                              Anyone talking about sacrifice never means it for themselves. It’s always someone else getting sacrificed. Of course, sometimes they get to participate anyway.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • H hector@lemmy.today

                                It really was almost comedic timing. That probably sounds insensitive, but on the other hand fuck their feelings.

                                M This user is from outside of this forum
                                M This user is from outside of this forum
                                mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
                                wrote last edited by
                                #25

                                jokes aren’t okay to only be directed at one side or another. everything is fair game

                                and objectively, his murder was ironic and with comedic timing, and that’s funny. regardless of it being a horrible event

                                H 1 Reply Last reply
                                3
                                • M mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca

                                  jokes aren’t okay to only be directed at one side or another. everything is fair game

                                  and objectively, his murder was ironic and with comedic timing, and that’s funny. regardless of it being a horrible event

                                  H This user is from outside of this forum
                                  H This user is from outside of this forum
                                  hector@lemmy.today
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #26

                                  Some of these jokes go right for the jugular too, neck and neck with other such jokes.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  3
                                  • W warl0k3@lemmy.world

                                    That’s a common definition for snuff but not the one I ascribe to. Pleb.

                                    Anyways here is the INCREDIBLY NSFL VIDEO

                                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                                    taalnazi@lemmy.world
                                    wrote last edited by taalnazi@lemmy.world
                                    #27

                                    Ahh, nothing as healing as a fascist getting what he fucking deserved. The best of course would’ve been for him to see the error of his ways, and renounce his hatred. But hey, oh well.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • B birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone

                                      There’s far-left, left, centre-left, centre, centre-right, right, and far-right.

                                      Far- is that which employs violence and suppresses all other opinions given the chance.

                                      Centre is that which is always open for compromise.

                                      The others are not always open for compromise, but discuss with each other in polite atmosphere.

                                      By definition, the far-right necessitates excluding anything less insane than itself.

                                      That said though, in my view the real spectrum is whether someone supports the workers. Be they American, Russian, Chinese, Vietnamese, Senegalese, Swiss, or whatever else.

                                      riwoR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      riwoR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      riwo
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #28

                                      Far- is that which employs violence and suppresses all other opinions given the chance.

                                      the “supresses all other opinions given the chance” carries a lot of the weight here, considering that like every statist and really almost everyone agrees with or accepts the employment of violence. really only the minority which is pacifists opposes it, and even pacifists often only oppose violence against humans.

                                      the suppression of all other opinions is then mostly just the destinction between soft and hard power, because ultimately, all who are in power either fight to remain there, or at the very least prevent those who dont share their interests from getting there. the question merely is whether they do this through violence or manipulation, and whether they do it to defend their own freedom or to maintain their domination over others.

                                      i’m sorry if my comment appears antagonistic. my antagonism is (most likely) not directed at you.

                                      i see the distinction between far-x and center as one which is mostly employed to moralize the degree to which people support the status quo, making it in many cases another weapon against dissent, in the arsenal of manipulation tactics. stuff makes me go on frantic rants :3

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • All Topics
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups